The Genre Director - DC 9/11 - TIME OF CRISIS director to RUSH LIMBAUGH: SHAME ON YOU!…but don’t stop.
January 28, 2009
What does America need right now: blood sport politics as entertainment or serious analysis of the issues?
Since Inauguration day, when we heard the door finally slam on the Bush Presidency, progressives have been engaged in a collective shudder of disbelief. How?!!!!
Internet humorists offer these visual aids to help us process the WTF quality of the last 8 years.
MSNBC’s Keith Olberman & Dr. Rachel Maddow provide nightly therapy and they do so with minimal gloating. Not so on the other side of punditry. Radio road rage addict Rush Limbaugh’s used racist imagery in his defiant wish for Obama to fail. Click his beautiful face for the video:
Limbaugh’s unpatriotic hope for the future would cause the average American’s suffering to increase rather than decrease, in order that a further demoralized population would then return power to the architects of its problems. Rush has a first amendment right to free speech, but in fact his unfeeling cynicism does his side of politics no favors by reminding us how far they are prepared to go. Limbaugh and fellow narcissistic motor mouth Sarah Palin are powerful advertisements for keeping progressives in power. So, don’t stow your yap, Rush, keep on digging.
It’s going to take time to clean up the garbage. So although we should be looking forward rather than back, we still need to investigate the mistakes of the past so we can put checks and balances in place to ensure we never repeat them. That’s not vengeance. That’s common sense. Progressive pundits sifting though the garbage is a vital public education service. The revelations of the coming months will be staggering.
I bet an enterprising theatre company will soon put a Bush Cheney spin on Bertolt Brecht’s “The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui.” 
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Or one day we’ll be like the little girl in POLTERGEIST staring at the TV, saying:
“They’re back…”
Tags: Film Industry, , Director, Film, Movie
The Storyboard Artist - DON’T CALL THIS A STORYBOARD COMEBACK!!!
January 28, 2009
Suffice it to say, the last seven months could not have sucked worse. It was the type of time that gives you a supreme “gut check” as it were. As a freelancer, it is one thing when you are single, and yet another when you have responsibilities of a wife and son.
So here I was in Golden Apple Comics, limiting myself to buying ONE comic (a treat, as I did just two days boarding an OLD NAVY COMMERCIAL – thanks Darryl H.) and I got a phone call asking if I was available for a feature.
I did not quite say “HELLLLLL YEA!!!!”, but I did not play it cute. If the job were drawing Benji the dog, I was on it like Salma Hayek on a horny billionaire. I said yes. This new film couldn’t even pay the rate I had gotten on the in-development-hell “THE A TEAM” film (now in re-boot at Fox with Joe Carnahan) but so long as they gave me something decent – hence, the negotiations – I was on it.
So, here I am using the TOON BOOM STORYBOARD PRO program in the proper aspect anamorphic ratio, drawing a very extensive action scene that has not quite gotten an actual location, yet.
I met with the stunt coordinator days earlier, an old friend, and we went over the sequence. I was given a fairly free reign, as it was all sketchy and they just needed to lay down a framework. The coordinator, Doug Coleman is a total pro and one of the top guys in the business.
Whatever I give him, Doug will use it as a starting point to work things out with the director and his stunt team. I kept everything very, very loose.
With the STORYBOARD PRO, I was able to make a quick animatic of the scene and get it to the clients. It’s also very smart to get a website (like SEND THIS FILE.COM) where you can upload large files that are too big to email. Then, the client gets a link, from where they can download the work. Ta ta for now…
Tags: , Movie, Oscars, Television, Filmmaking
The Casting Director - A Busy Week…
January 28, 2009
I am not in Chicago…yet. This week, the Producers & Directors are there. I am now casting two films that are shooting in Chicago: “Polish Bar” and “Audrey.” This happened because the production company of P-Bar decided to stay in Chicago and add on another SAG Modified Low-Budget film (“Audrey”) to their slate. Illinois has a very attractive tax incentive package and is very friendly to filmmakers, which is great, so while I am there I will be looking for actors for both films.
In the meantime, I am also trying to attach an actor to an Australian horror comedy (with Film Industry Blogger’s very own Brian Trenchard-Smith as Executive Producer). The film is very “loosely” financed – and will be looking for private equity investors so a recognizable name is key. We are out to Juliette Lewis, and I am hopeful, I think the role is right for her, but it is hard for actors to commit in these sorts of situations. If not her, I am already preparing for her to pass (“because, Actors pass”) and thinking about actors who may be interested in this script and willing to attach themselves without hard cash. The script is very good, so I am crossing my fingers on this one.
Last week I had to do additional casting for a film that shot last year in the Bahamas, “Way of the Dolphin.” The film had some additional scenes to shoot and they are doing it this week in Santa Clarita. I needed to find three actors. I did, they are all great, but there was a momentary drama with one of them. The costume designer sent an email to one of the actors introducing herself and asking the actor to bring some clothes with him. The actor responded in a harsh tone and explained that he didn’t have everything on her list and was nervous about what he was getting into and then suggested that the costume designer go shopping for the clothes.
Well, as you can imagine, drama then ensued. The costume designer forwarded the email to the Producer and Director saying that the actor was rude. I then got an email discussing the fact that maybe we should replace the actor. Now, I admit that the email was rude, but the actor is a good actor and it was only for one day, so I told everyone to calm down and that I would talk to the actor directly. When I did, he was as nice as could be and had no idea that his email would have pissed anyone off. So, I told everyone on the Production not to worry and all would be fine.
Well, I am glad to say, all was fine. In fact I received an email last night from the Producer thanking me for an excellent cast on such short notice.
It is nice when things work out.
Tags: Film, , Filmmaker, Filmmaking, Movie
The Business Affairs Assistant - Translating Legalese into English
January 27, 2009
As I mentioned in my last post, after a deal is settled on, those terms are delineated in a “long form” contract. And as we all know, contracts are ridiculous.
They’re impossible to read, supposedly for the sake of being precise and incontrovertible, especially language that’s been tested for …
Tags: Television, Filmmaker, Director, Film Blog, Film Industry
The Script Reader - Awards I Would Give for Movies in 2008
January 27, 2009
Best Film That Nobody Saw But That I Loved Maybe More Than Any Other Film:
Happy-Go-Lucky (Mike Leigh + Sally Hawkins = True Love Always)
Runner up: Frozen River (I have not yet met one other person in the face who saw this. See this.)
Best Films That Nobody Saw Including Me And …
Tags: Director, Movie, Television, Film Blog,
The Standby Painter - The Old, Deserted Insane Asylum! Part 2
January 26, 2009
JUST A NOTE before we devolve back into the exciting adventure we began last week, which, by the way, is a true story according to the Lifetime Network Movie definition of ‘true story’. There are some excellent, timely, incredibly interesting blogs out this week which put my little narrative to …
Tags: Movie Bloggers, Director, Filmmaker, Movie Theatre, Film
The Reality TV Producer - Reality Fights Back… Remember where you were.
January 23, 2009
Further to my post of last week, this week a long running David / Golliath story just got wrapped up with a settlement of over $4M dollars being paid to Reality staffers for just the sorts of practaces I mentioned in last week’s blog.
The class action law-suit was brought by a …
Tags: Actor, , Filmmaker, Television, Film Industry
The Documentary Producer - An interview with Editor Micheal Horwitz of FUEL…
January 23, 2009
The press is alive with buzz about the Academy nominated films and if you want my two cents… I have to say I think they got it wrong this year. MY Oscar goes to Josh Tickell of FUEL. The heart, mind and message of this film are masterfully created and it is clear true filmmakers lie behind the celluloid (or tape). I had the chance to catch up with Micheal just before the Academy made its decision. Enjoy!
Hi Michael,
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts with our readers. As I have told you, I am very impressed with your work on the Academy short-listed film FUEL. In many of my blogs I have written about the importance of an editor in documentary film. To me, the editor is the MOST important person on a documentary for the director to work with. So let’s begin….
Tell us a bit about your path to this point.
Thanks for the opportunity to share with your readers. So diving right in, my path to this point….If you had a time machine and you traveled back to 1997, UC Santa Cruz film school, found me wandering the halls of the communications building and said, Hi Michael, I’m from the future, and I’m here to tell you that 11 years from now you will be an editor and your first major film is an environmentally friendly documentary - I would have probably laughed in your face! At the time I never imagined myself as an editor. I wanted to be Spielberg or Coppola! The editing equipment at school rarely worked and when it did, it wasn’t properly maintained. But after graduating and doing a rather ambitious World War II love story for my thesis film, which was called Grand Central, I decided post production and editing was the best place to get a job. I started at the bottom and began as a runner and production assistant working for companies that produced movie trailers. I hung out with the editors, I learned to use the AVID and I was hooked.
How did you come to work on this film?
I came to FUEL from that world - creative advertising, editing trailers and TV spots for independent films and video games, a job I enjoyed and still enjoy very much but I was literally plucked out of obscurity. One of the producers I was working with at the time said he knew of this documentary project and it had something to do with oil and they needed a promo cut. I said sure, why not? I took the meeting, met one of the film’s producers and met Josh Tickell the director. When I first saw the footage, I was like, “WOW! This is amazing, truly eye-opening stuff, you guys are going to win an Academy Award!” I brought my bag of trailer editing tricks, cut the promo and when I was finished I wished Josh good luck with his film, never expecting to hear from him again. Apparently I made quite an impression, cause three months later, just when I was starting to feel a little job burnout, he called and asked me to come cut the movie.
I understand there were a few cuts. Even one after FUEL won the audience award at Sundance. Tell us a bit about that.
First off getting a cut to Sundance was no easy feat. Everyone talks about getting their film into Sundance and we were no different. And our presence at Sundance was huge! Not because we had celebrities with us, we just had a lot of volunteers - people on main street spreading the word, passing out schwag bags with buttons, beanie hats and coffee mugs and also the Veggie Van driving around was a big hit and so we were popular. (It’s fun to be popular, I was never the popular kid) Our film spoke to people, inspired people, educated them as well as provided entertainment, and even after winning the audience award, we knew would go back and tweak the film. What we weren’t prepared for was what was happening in the world outside of Sundance in regards to biofuels. Within 48 hours after the end of the festival there was a huge, world wide media blitz on the potential dangers of biofuels - biofuels are causing deforestation in the rain forests and starving children in Mexico and Africa. The topic of Food Vs Fuel was everywhere with the finger pointed at Corn based Ethanol. Suddenly it was bracketed by the media and even by environmental organizations that ALL biofuels are bad, including biodiesel. We didn’t address this in the film, we didn’t know! And in making a documentary, as filmmakers, you have a responsibility to provide people with the whole story as unbiased as possible. If we didn’t address this issue, we would not be fulfilling our duty as filmmakers. So we went back to re-cut, more research, more fundraising. And in the process, like a caterpillar emerging from its cocoon into a butterfly, the film went from a little happy, hippie biodiesel movie to a really beautiful, deeper, thought provoking conversation on alternative energy, sustainability and most importantly providing SOLUTIONS that all of us can participate in our every day lives today.
The first cut I saw was a few years ago and when I had the opportunity to see this version, there were only three shots I recognized. What was it like to see all your work on the cutting room floor?
Its a process. You get attached to some things and have to let them go. And the more I got invested in the footage, there were certainly things that got cut, that I really wanted to keep in. I fought hard for a whole section on Australia and what they’re up to with biodiesel, but in the end, you have to let it go. The Katrina rescue mission was originally longer and cut in a far more heroic and exciting way, but ultimately it didn’t serve the story acurately. (I saved it for my reel) There are a number of things to consider and you don’t want to make a three hour documentary. We had well over 800 hours of footage, we had enough footage to make six different films - and I’ll bet you all of them would have been really good. But only one would have been great, and that is the one you see in the final cut of FUEL.
Josh is a very passionate individual and incredibly smart. What was it like to work with such a director?
First off, I’m very grateful to have worked with Josh on this film, not only is he my director, he’s my friend and he’s my teacher. I’ve gotten a SERIOUS green education from working on the film with him, more than I ever would from any college course. In the beginning the process is always rocky because you’re testing the chemistry with your director, you’re pushing each other, you challenging each other, you argue, you agree, you try things that work, things that don’t work, etc. And you have to work out those kinks because an editor / director relationship is one in which you’re gonna be spending a lot of time with one another, more than your own girlfriend or family. There were quite a few marathon editing sessions that lasted 24 hours straight! The secret? Chocolate covered Espresso Beans and those keychain 2GB USB flash drives! Needless to say we got to know each other pretty well. I am also a very passionate person and I bring that to the table in any film project I commit to, but Josh’s passion is for green energy, being an environmentalist and an activist. My passion is for filmmaking, storytelling, movies, music and so we balanced each other out.
What is the message FUEL is delivering?
FUEL is delivering the message that sustainable green energy is not only possible, its available today and you reading this very article right now can get involved. Through Josh’s incredible journey, we learn that everyone has the ability to do something in their lives and in their communities to make changes to get us away from petroleum based, pollution fuels and gasoline to clean burning, green energy technologies and fuels to create a better world for our children. The one technology we explore in the film that I think is the most amazing is fuel from Algae! Yeah, the stuff that grows in your pool or the side of your aquarium if you don’t clean it. Fuel from algae, who knew, right? Ultimately though, the message of the film is one of compassion and hope. I am always amazed how after screenings people feel so personally inspired.
How has working on this film directly affected your life?
I was in the dark on these issues prior to this film. I was locked up in my happy little trailer editing cave and then suddenly it was like KABOOM! Welcome to the revolution. I’ll never forget Josh’s words, “so Mike, are you ready to take the green pill?” And even though I still drive a gas car, my next car will either be a used 2006 Jeep Liberty CRD (Common Rail Diesel) or if I go brand new, it will be the 2009 Jetta TDI wagon, a diesel car which I can run on sustainable biodiesel - there’s no question about it. I may have to go out of my way initially to fill up, but I think its more than worth the effort.
Do you have any advice for up and coming editors?
Don’t do a documentary for your first film! Haha! Unless you are ridiculously ambitious like me! Seriously though editing a documentary is a nightmare because you have so much footage that you will be driven to the cliffs of insanity! (Anyone get the movie reference?) Luckily we brought on a co-editor, the lovely Tina Imahara who had come out of AFI grad school and cut documentaries before me. I learned a lot from her and couldn’t have done my job without her. But I would advise any up and coming editors to really get hands on with film, if you can. Go out of your way to learn the old school ways and then apply what you learn to the digital world. I had the benefit of learning to cut actual film on a moviola in film school and I’m very grateful to have learned that process. Now with digital editing as the standard, the creative results are enormous. I I don’t know how many film schools still have the old flatbed editing systems around but if you can dig one up, research where to take a class, learn that and benefit from that, I think you will feel more like an editor and a filmmaker for having that knowledge. I say it often and I know a lot of people agree with me, just because you have Final Cut Pro and a laptop, that doesn’t mean you’re an editor. This new generation is standing on the shoulders of the great filmmakers of today so we can be the great filmmakers of tomorrow and I think its our responsibility in some part to use their tools and methods to enhance ours. Spielberg still cuts on a flatbed, okay he’s the only one in Hollywood doing it, but I think holding the actual film in your hands and working with it gives you something Final Cut Pro or AVID can never give you - humility for the evolving art of editing.
When I saw Cassavetes film Shadows, I knew I had to become a filmmaker. Was there a film like that for you?
Is it too cliche to say “Raiders of the Lost Ark”? There are just so many films that have inspired me, so many different filmmakers that to choose just one would seem unfair to another. Like so many I grew up fascinated by Spielberg’s body of work but even more so by watching his craft mature into balancing historical and serious subject matters with popcorn entertainment. I love Hitchcock for his classical style, Cameron Crowe for his witty humor, Alfonso Cuarón for his sense of wonderment, Ridley Scott for his epic vision and hands down anything that comes from Pixar.
Thank you Michael!
Tags: , Filmmaking, Movie Bloggers, Filmmaker, Movie Theatre
The Editor - How To Edit — Working With Context
January 23, 2009
This past week, I ran a panel at the Sundance Film Festival which touched on some of the thoughts that I explore in my book THE LEAN FORWARD MOMENT. The panel, which included Sterlin Harjo (BARKING WATER), Ondi Timoner (WE LIVE IN PUBLIC) and editor Jason Steward (WORLD’S GREATEST DAD) touched on how each of them shaped their stories, despite budget and scheduling difficulties.
One of the things that we touched on was context. That is, the impact of a moment comes only from its contrast with its surrounding moments. This is something that I’ve long called “The Rule of Threes” (remember that, since I’m a professor, I can’t invent terms to my heart’s content). The rule is, very simply:
A shot, a scene or a sequence, is directly affected by the shot, scene or sequence that comes before it, and will directly affect the shot, scene or sequence that comes after it.
Makes sense, eh? You’re going to feel differently about a person firing a gun if you’ve seen the gun ahead of time and thought that he might fire it. Alfred Hitchcock called it the difference between surprise and suspense.
A pretty cool demonstration of this comes in this video, which basically follows one guy as he does ninja-style tricks in a variety of settings (it’s basically a demo reel for his stuntman acting career). I’ll wait until you go off and see it.
Click here for the Metacafe video of
URBAN FLYING NINJA
So, what did you notice, other than the fact that the guy is probably pretty good (or, at the very least, daring)? Well, for me, the interesting thing is how the same ninja moves look totally different:
- when they’re done in a gym than in a shopping mall
- when they’re repeated and repeated.
The first few scenes of the film show him jumping off a roof, doing his moves on various buildings and then doing them again in a shopping mall. It’s pretty impressive. Most of the rest of the movie shows him doing similar moves in gyms, with floor padding, or on stage. Oddly, even though some of the moves are cooler, they look less interesting in a gym, where we’ve seen plenty of gymnastics before. When he finally gets to showing himself acting in a film, it’s a big ho-hum because we’ve seen that a million times already.
The moments when we lean forward and pay attention, are the moments when something changes in the film — he jumps into a prop well, or he does a long series of back flips without a camera cut.
Context is everything. The impact of this man’s work is most felt when it shows something has changed from the surrounding material. The editor in me keeps thinking that the piece might have been better if the areas in the gym were trimmed down and moved earlier in the film. That way, we could see the more unusual setting last.
My point here is that that is how an editor thinks — what is the story you’re trying to affect and audience with, and how can we shape the material to get them to understand that feeling.
Next week, I’m going to try and talk some about what I learned up at Sundance. Until then, I’ve written about my observations with stereoscopic films (which I saw up there) over at my blog Hollyn-wood. See you around!!
Tags: Movie Blog, Director, , Film Industry, Film
The Indie Film Producer - SUNDANCE OR DIE
January 23, 2009
Aw, man. I begged and pleaded then threatened my friend John Sullivan who was going to Sundance to regularly send me reports from the festival so I could post them here, kind of as a man-on-the-scene blog special. Well, he did his job. I, on the other hand, did not. …
Tags: Movie Bloggers, Actor, Hollywood, Movie, Film Industry










